<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Uncontrolled rant at the celebration of mediocrity present in today&#8217;s society</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ishootfilm.org.uk/2008/01/10/uncontrolled-rant-at-the-celebration-of-mediocrity-present-in-todays-society/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ishootfilm.org.uk/2008/01/10/uncontrolled-rant-at-the-celebration-of-mediocrity-present-in-todays-society/</link>
	<description>A Film Photography Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 02:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: namke</title>
		<link>http://www.ishootfilm.org.uk/2008/01/10/uncontrolled-rant-at-the-celebration-of-mediocrity-present-in-todays-society/comment-page-1/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>namke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 22:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ishootfilm.org.uk/2008/01/10/uncontrolled-rant-at-the-celebration-of-mediocrity-present-in-todays-society/#comment-71</guid>
		<description>Well, I suppose I set myself up for this one..

Even though I have been singularly scathing about the level of pictures that I have seen in photographic exhibitions presented at our camera club (&lt;a href="http://www.yorkps.org.uk" rel="nofollow"&gt;York Photographic Society&lt;/a&gt;), I must admit that I cannot level the same complaint at the club competitions themselves - the judges have not always scored the &lt;i&gt;interesting&lt;/i&gt; photos particularly well, preferring &lt;i&gt;safety&lt;/i&gt; over &lt;i&gt;great art&lt;/i&gt;.

Anyway, back to the point. Last night saw the judging of the annual &lt;strong&gt;digital and projected images competition&lt;/strong&gt;. I had entered five pictures - one digital, and four slides. The judge (Peter Yeo) offered extremely helpful, directed, comments, suggesting both technical and compositional tips for each and every picture shown.
In all, there were 140 entries for the digital images competition, and 40 for the slide competition. My digital entry was 'dynamic', but didn't make it into a place. My slides, however, fared somewhat better - I had two 'walkway's and two 'York Fog's - one of the walkway pictures (My favourite, by the way - Manchester airport at night, fact fans) had very interesting technical comments (good control of highlights, perhaps half-a-stop extra exposure would have made it even better), but the big surprise was that my 'York Fog 2 - Millenium Bridge' gained second place.

Eek.

Ok, so none of the entries I made were specifically pandering to the judge; they are all pictures that &lt;b&gt;I&lt;/b&gt; am pleased with, so that's good. It's just a surprise to actually get placed. One downside (Heh, there has to be one!) is that I am now not eligible for the 'New Members Print Competition' (which I was hoping to enter) since I have now gained a 'first, second, or third place'.

Oh - one more thing... There's a related competition - The &lt;i&gt;John Saville Rose Bowl&lt;/i&gt; which is awarded for a picture depicting an aspect of the City of York.

'York Fog 2 - Millenium Bridge' won that.

It's official: I am mediocre.

Blimey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I suppose I set myself up for this one..</p>
<p>Even though I have been singularly scathing about the level of pictures that I have seen in photographic exhibitions presented at our camera club (<a href="http://www.yorkps.org.uk" rel="nofollow">York Photographic Society</a>), I must admit that I cannot level the same complaint at the club competitions themselves - the judges have not always scored the <i>interesting</i> photos particularly well, preferring <i>safety</i> over <i>great art</i>.</p>
<p>Anyway, back to the point. Last night saw the judging of the annual <strong>digital and projected images competition</strong>. I had entered five pictures - one digital, and four slides. The judge (Peter Yeo) offered extremely helpful, directed, comments, suggesting both technical and compositional tips for each and every picture shown.<br />
In all, there were 140 entries for the digital images competition, and 40 for the slide competition. My digital entry was &#8216;dynamic&#8217;, but didn&#8217;t make it into a place. My slides, however, fared somewhat better - I had two &#8216;walkway&#8217;s and two &#8216;York Fog&#8217;s - one of the walkway pictures (My favourite, by the way - Manchester airport at night, fact fans) had very interesting technical comments (good control of highlights, perhaps half-a-stop extra exposure would have made it even better), but the big surprise was that my &#8216;York Fog 2 - Millenium Bridge&#8217; gained second place.</p>
<p>Eek.</p>
<p>Ok, so none of the entries I made were specifically pandering to the judge; they are all pictures that <b>I</b> am pleased with, so that&#8217;s good. It&#8217;s just a surprise to actually get placed. One downside (Heh, there has to be one!) is that I am now not eligible for the &#8216;New Members Print Competition&#8217; (which I was hoping to enter) since I have now gained a &#8216;first, second, or third place&#8217;.</p>
<p>Oh - one more thing&#8230; There&#8217;s a related competition - The <i>John Saville Rose Bowl</i> which is awarded for a picture depicting an aspect of the City of York.</p>
<p>&#8216;York Fog 2 - Millenium Bridge&#8217; won that.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s official: I am mediocre.</p>
<p>Blimey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://www.ishootfilm.org.uk/2008/01/10/uncontrolled-rant-at-the-celebration-of-mediocrity-present-in-todays-society/comment-page-1/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 23:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ishootfilm.org.uk/2008/01/10/uncontrolled-rant-at-the-celebration-of-mediocrity-present-in-todays-society/#comment-67</guid>
		<description>lol that is so true.  I used to be a member of a photographic club and one of the judges frowned apon small DOF, everything in the image had to be pin sharp.  I don't go to clubs now since I get more feed back from my images online, not camera club judges that have no real sense of photographic ability.

kudos for this blog</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol that is so true.  I used to be a member of a photographic club and one of the judges frowned apon small DOF, everything in the image had to be pin sharp.  I don&#8217;t go to clubs now since I get more feed back from my images online, not camera club judges that have no real sense of photographic ability.</p>
<p>kudos for this blog</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
