<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Man In The White Suit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ishootfilm.org.uk/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ishootfilm.org.uk</link>
	<description>A Film Photography Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 03:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Uncontrolled rant at the celebration of mediocrity present in today&#8217;s society by namke</title>
		<link>http://www.ishootfilm.org.uk/2008/01/10/uncontrolled-rant-at-the-celebration-of-mediocrity-present-in-todays-society/comment-page-1/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>namke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 22:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ishootfilm.org.uk/2008/01/10/uncontrolled-rant-at-the-celebration-of-mediocrity-present-in-todays-society/#comment-71</guid>
		<description>Well, I suppose I set myself up for this one..

Even though I have been singularly scathing about the level of pictures that I have seen in photographic exhibitions presented at our camera club (&lt;a href="http://www.yorkps.org.uk" rel="nofollow"&gt;York Photographic Society&lt;/a&gt;), I must admit that I cannot level the same complaint at the club competitions themselves - the judges have not always scored the &lt;i&gt;interesting&lt;/i&gt; photos particularly well, preferring &lt;i&gt;safety&lt;/i&gt; over &lt;i&gt;great art&lt;/i&gt;.

Anyway, back to the point. Last night saw the judging of the annual &lt;strong&gt;digital and projected images competition&lt;/strong&gt;. I had entered five pictures - one digital, and four slides. The judge (Peter Yeo) offered extremely helpful, directed, comments, suggesting both technical and compositional tips for each and every picture shown.
In all, there were 140 entries for the digital images competition, and 40 for the slide competition. My digital entry was 'dynamic', but didn't make it into a place. My slides, however, fared somewhat better - I had two 'walkway's and two 'York Fog's - one of the walkway pictures (My favourite, by the way - Manchester airport at night, fact fans) had very interesting technical comments (good control of highlights, perhaps half-a-stop extra exposure would have made it even better), but the big surprise was that my 'York Fog 2 - Millenium Bridge' gained second place.

Eek.

Ok, so none of the entries I made were specifically pandering to the judge; they are all pictures that &lt;b&gt;I&lt;/b&gt; am pleased with, so that's good. It's just a surprise to actually get placed. One downside (Heh, there has to be one!) is that I am now not eligible for the 'New Members Print Competition' (which I was hoping to enter) since I have now gained a 'first, second, or third place'.

Oh - one more thing... There's a related competition - The &lt;i&gt;John Saville Rose Bowl&lt;/i&gt; which is awarded for a picture depicting an aspect of the City of York.

'York Fog 2 - Millenium Bridge' won that.

It's official: I am mediocre.

Blimey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I suppose I set myself up for this one..</p>
<p>Even though I have been singularly scathing about the level of pictures that I have seen in photographic exhibitions presented at our camera club (<a href="http://www.yorkps.org.uk" rel="nofollow">York Photographic Society</a>), I must admit that I cannot level the same complaint at the club competitions themselves - the judges have not always scored the <i>interesting</i> photos particularly well, preferring <i>safety</i> over <i>great art</i>.</p>
<p>Anyway, back to the point. Last night saw the judging of the annual <strong>digital and projected images competition</strong>. I had entered five pictures - one digital, and four slides. The judge (Peter Yeo) offered extremely helpful, directed, comments, suggesting both technical and compositional tips for each and every picture shown.<br />
In all, there were 140 entries for the digital images competition, and 40 for the slide competition. My digital entry was &#8216;dynamic&#8217;, but didn&#8217;t make it into a place. My slides, however, fared somewhat better - I had two &#8216;walkway&#8217;s and two &#8216;York Fog&#8217;s - one of the walkway pictures (My favourite, by the way - Manchester airport at night, fact fans) had very interesting technical comments (good control of highlights, perhaps half-a-stop extra exposure would have made it even better), but the big surprise was that my &#8216;York Fog 2 - Millenium Bridge&#8217; gained second place.</p>
<p>Eek.</p>
<p>Ok, so none of the entries I made were specifically pandering to the judge; they are all pictures that <b>I</b> am pleased with, so that&#8217;s good. It&#8217;s just a surprise to actually get placed. One downside (Heh, there has to be one!) is that I am now not eligible for the &#8216;New Members Print Competition&#8217; (which I was hoping to enter) since I have now gained a &#8216;first, second, or third place&#8217;.</p>
<p>Oh - one more thing&#8230; There&#8217;s a related competition - The <i>John Saville Rose Bowl</i> which is awarded for a picture depicting an aspect of the City of York.</p>
<p>&#8216;York Fog 2 - Millenium Bridge&#8217; won that.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s official: I am mediocre.</p>
<p>Blimey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wonderful by namke</title>
		<link>http://www.ishootfilm.org.uk/2008/01/15/wonderful/comment-page-1/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>namke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 09:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ishootfilm.org.uk/2008/01/15/wonderful/#comment-68</guid>
		<description>That's weird - looking at the picture it &lt;i&gt;looks&lt;/i&gt; like it's taller than it is wide (i.e. it gives the impression of being a 'portrait' orientation). Looking at the image details, I find that it's actually 6 pixels wider than it is tall....

... A nice trick - and very nicely composed. Cool, thanks for that :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s weird - looking at the picture it <i>looks</i> like it&#8217;s taller than it is wide (i.e. it gives the impression of being a &#8216;portrait&#8217; orientation). Looking at the image details, I find that it&#8217;s actually 6 pixels wider than it is tall&#8230;.</p>
<p>&#8230; A nice trick - and very nicely composed. Cool, thanks for that <img src='http://www.ishootfilm.org.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Uncontrolled rant at the celebration of mediocrity present in today&#8217;s society by Ross</title>
		<link>http://www.ishootfilm.org.uk/2008/01/10/uncontrolled-rant-at-the-celebration-of-mediocrity-present-in-todays-society/comment-page-1/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 23:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ishootfilm.org.uk/2008/01/10/uncontrolled-rant-at-the-celebration-of-mediocrity-present-in-todays-society/#comment-67</guid>
		<description>lol that is so true.  I used to be a member of a photographic club and one of the judges frowned apon small DOF, everything in the image had to be pin sharp.  I don't go to clubs now since I get more feed back from my images online, not camera club judges that have no real sense of photographic ability.

kudos for this blog</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol that is so true.  I used to be a member of a photographic club and one of the judges frowned apon small DOF, everything in the image had to be pin sharp.  I don&#8217;t go to clubs now since I get more feed back from my images online, not camera club judges that have no real sense of photographic ability.</p>
<p>kudos for this blog</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Brooks Jensen on photo printing and editions by DDM</title>
		<link>http://www.ishootfilm.org.uk/2007/10/18/brooks-jensen-on-photo-printing-and-editions/comment-page-1/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>DDM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 11:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ishootfilm.org.uk/2007/10/18/brooks-jensen-on-photo-printing-and-editions/#comment-63</guid>
		<description>What's the difference between him and the rest of the world?  Other than he can elaborate almost convincingly what his intentions are.  Like with anything in this progressive world of ours - you cannot stay old school forever.  I agree with RDB Korn: He wants to have his cake and eat it too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the difference between him and the rest of the world?  Other than he can elaborate almost convincingly what his intentions are.  Like with anything in this progressive world of ours - you cannot stay old school forever.  I agree with RDB Korn: He wants to have his cake and eat it too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Brooks Jensen on photo printing and editions by RDB Korn</title>
		<link>http://www.ishootfilm.org.uk/2007/10/18/brooks-jensen-on-photo-printing-and-editions/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>RDB Korn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 07:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ishootfilm.org.uk/2007/10/18/brooks-jensen-on-photo-printing-and-editions/#comment-61</guid>
		<description>Well...Mr Jensen is full of it. He wants to have his cake and eat it too. He knows full well that if he produces what's referred to as an "open edition" (i.e. unlimited) of his work, the market value will be less (perhaps far less) than for a limited edition. So the summarize his philosophy succinctly, he intends to produce an open edition by printing it in batches, each batch to be designated as its own edition, complete with the type of numbering associated with a limited edition. This is just another wrinkle on the giclee merchants who produce editions of thousands in whatever size fits on your wall. Despite his intentions, what Jensen is doing is not the best thing for the people who support him by buying his work. Not by a long-shot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230;Mr Jensen is full of it. He wants to have his cake and eat it too. He knows full well that if he produces what&#8217;s referred to as an &#8220;open edition&#8221; (i.e. unlimited) of his work, the market value will be less (perhaps far less) than for a limited edition. So the summarize his philosophy succinctly, he intends to produce an open edition by printing it in batches, each batch to be designated as its own edition, complete with the type of numbering associated with a limited edition. This is just another wrinkle on the giclee merchants who produce editions of thousands in whatever size fits on your wall. Despite his intentions, what Jensen is doing is not the best thing for the people who support him by buying his work. Not by a long-shot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wharcliffe Works by DrJoolz</title>
		<link>http://www.ishootfilm.org.uk/2007/05/22/wharcliffe-works/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>DrJoolz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 20:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brendadada.net/whitesuit/2007/05/22/wharcliffe-works/#comment-26</guid>
		<description>FWIW, this is the Wharncliffe works! (Is it pedantic to point this out?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FWIW, this is the Wharncliffe works! (Is it pedantic to point this out?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About &#8216;Launch&#8217; by brendadada</title>
		<link>http://www.ishootfilm.org.uk/2007/07/11/about-launch/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>brendadada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 23:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ishootfilm.org.uk/2007/07/11/about-launch/#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Answer? I don't know about the sizing, we shall have to ask the experts.

I am so pleased you're putting these here. They are just about my most favourite photographs ever. I do remember what it was like when those ships towered over the houses, and the noise at all hours was terrible. Might have to post a few of my photos of the last remaining cranes down at Swan Hunter. 

Thank you, Ian.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Answer? I don&#8217;t know about the sizing, we shall have to ask the experts.</p>
<p>I am so pleased you&#8217;re putting these here. They are just about my most favourite photographs ever. I do remember what it was like when those ships towered over the houses, and the noise at all hours was terrible. Might have to post a few of my photos of the last remaining cranes down at Swan Hunter. </p>
<p>Thank you, Ian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Large Format by Nolan Smock</title>
		<link>http://www.ishootfilm.org.uk/2007/06/22/large-format/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Nolan Smock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 18:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brendadada.net/whitesuit/2007/06/22/large-format/#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Ah! Got it!

And Mathew, I'm doing the same thing soon. I've been seeing a lot of 8x10 negatives/contact prints and they are incredible. It's hard to go back.

I think it's the closeness to painting which really attracts me, process-wise. It's possibly a bit distancing, but there's a lot of work I want to do which calls for that, I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah! Got it!</p>
<p>And Mathew, I&#8217;m doing the same thing soon. I&#8217;ve been seeing a lot of 8&#215;10 negatives/contact prints and they are incredible. It&#8217;s hard to go back.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s the closeness to painting which really attracts me, process-wise. It&#8217;s possibly a bit distancing, but there&#8217;s a lot of work I want to do which calls for that, I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Large Format by Mathew Savage</title>
		<link>http://www.ishootfilm.org.uk/2007/06/22/large-format/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathew Savage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 14:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brendadada.net/whitesuit/2007/06/22/large-format/#comment-16</guid>
		<description>I'd love to have a go with some large format stuff.

Maybe when the student loan comes through.
I can't any of it making it's way to be spent on things realted to studying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d love to have a go with some large format stuff.</p>
<p>Maybe when the student loan comes through.<br />
I can&#8217;t any of it making it&#8217;s way to be spent on things realted to studying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wharcliffe Works by savvo</title>
		<link>http://www.ishootfilm.org.uk/2007/05/22/wharcliffe-works/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>savvo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 09:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brendadada.net/whitesuit/2007/05/22/wharcliffe-works/#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Rollei Retro ( http://www.silverprint.co.uk/bwf7.html ) is Agfa APX. I wish they made it in 5x4</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rollei Retro ( <a href="http://www.silverprint.co.uk/bwf7.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.silverprint.co.uk/bwf7.html</a> ) is Agfa APX. I wish they made it in 5&#215;4</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
